Ensayo "el tunel"

La novela el tunel, escrita por Ernesto Sabato, comienza con el relato del personaje principal, llamado Juan Pablo Castell, relatando su propia historia, confesando que el era el responsable de la muerte de Maria Iribarne. Juan pablo conocio a Maria en un salon de arte donde presento su cuadro, y se enamoro de ella rapidamente ya que Maria era la unica que habia mirado la mujer que se encontraba en la ventana de su propia pintura. Una tarde la vio en la calle, la siguio hasta el edificio donde ella se encontraba. Luego conversaron y Maria le fue contando su vida. Juan Pablo se entera que es infiel a su marido (ciego), ya que se va constantemente a ver a Hunter, su primo.

Esta novela se vincula con las caracteristicas de la novela piscologica y policial. La caracteristica policial se encuentra en el crimen de Juan Pablo hacia Maria, aunque ya al principio podemos saber que sucedio, ya que la historia comienza con el relato de Juan Pablo contando su asesinato. La caracteristica piscologica la podemos encontrar en toda la novela: "la observe todo el tiempo con ansiedad", "esa noche volvi a casa nervioso, descontento, triste".En estas citas podemos observar que Juan Pablo constantemente relata sus pensamientos, sus sentimientos, su estado de animo.El existencialismo Ernesto Sabato lo demuestra por medio del pensamiento de Juan Pablo Castel,  quien a lo largo de todo el libro corrobora su angustia por los conflictos esenciales y trascendentales de la existencia humana.

En conclusion Juan Pablo se enamora de una mujer, que practicamente no se siente identificada con el, aunque el este perdidamente enamorado de ella. Y Juan Pablo a lo largo de la historia demuestra que se va dando cuenta que cuando Maria Iribarne iba a la estancia a ver al "primo" hunter, realmente iba a verlo porque era su amante y le era infiel a su marido ciego.

Euthanasia essay

"Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering", it also means "good death". Although, this is just the oppossite, the cause of death is not the patients disease but something that is done to the patient to cause his or her death, because euthanasia ends another person's life and it's wrong to perform it.
Firstly there is a big difference between killing a people who ask for death, and killing people without their knowledge. Euthanasia is an inhuman way of taking care of a difficult problem, but it's not inhuman to keep someone alive as long as possible, because if a cure is found, then the victim could possibly go on to live a long life. It would be inhuman not letting the victim live the rest of his life. Except if the person asks to be killed in a good way. The court of appeals of washington said "helping a person who wants to end his life constitutes a criminal act and subjects the aider to the possibility of a lengthy term of imprisonment, even if the recipient of the help is a terminally ill and the aider is a licensed physician who is providing medical assistance at the request of the patient".
Secondly, euthanasia is categorized in different ways: voluntary; which is the practice of ending a life in a painless manner, non voluntary euthanasia, that is euthanasia conducted where the explicit consent of the individual concerned is unavailable, such as when the person is in a persistent vegetative state. "Voluntary euthanasia" is legal in some countries, "non voluntary" euthanasia is illegal in all countries. In some countries there is divisive public controversy over the moral, ethical, and legal issues of euthanasia. Those who are against may argue fot the sanitty of life, while proponents of euthanasia rights emphasize alleviating suffering and preserving bodily integrity.
In conclusion, i believe that euthanasia should be illegal because instead of being a "good death" its totally the contrary.  Opposing my self, i think that if the person is suffering a lot and he asked to be killed, euthanasia should exist.

Euthanasia